See also:
How The Tobacco Deal Compares To Standards
tobacco.org
Analysis by Brion Fox and Stan Glantz of how the proposed June 20th 1997 "global settlement" deal compared with established standards.![A Public Health Analysis of the Proposed Resolution of [the 1997 United States] Tobacco Litigation](/s7-TEBr7-OVYQPr7-FRVEBGVFBCREs7-s7-n8-CGGUq8-YEHs8-KCFNr7-RTNZVs7-TEBr7-FGBUFOZHUGr7-ARCB-out.jpg)
A Public Health Analysis of the Proposed Resolution of [the 1997 United States] Tobacco Litigation
repositories.cdlib.org
UCSF policy analysis paper examines the proposed tobacco settlement agreement. (February 1, 1998)- Analysis of the Proposed 1997 Resolution
tobacco.org
Analysis of the Master Settlement Agreement by Fox, Lightwood and Glantz; examines whether it lives up to its billing and what it's likely to do for the industry and for the public. 
The Master Settlement Agreement and the Future of State and Local Tobacco Control
tobacco.neu.edu
Paper provides a legal and public policy analysis of selected topics and provisions of the multistate Master Settlement Agreement of November 23, 1998, including effects on other legal actions, tobacco advertising, youth access, lobbying, and the national foundation.
The "Global Settlement" with the Tobacco Industry: 6 Years Later
ajph.org
Analysis compares the provisions of the proposed 1997 "global settlement" with what was achieved without it, finds the settlement has little to offer.
Smoking, The African American Community and The Proposed National Settlement
academic.udayton.edu
Scholarly article analyzes how well the proposed June 20 1997 federal tobacco deal addresses the impact of tobacco on the African American community; internal tobacco industry documents are cited on how the industry targetted African Americans.
|
